The past century has seen the theory of the structure of the universe change in order to comply with its observed expansion and the theory of general relativity. However, new observations put under strain that picture, for at least two reasons: it requires the introduction of unknown forces that tend to increase with time the rate of expansion; it does not explain the existence of quasars. In the following we are going to introduce a new, rather sketchy description of how things might instead work.
Let’s try to derive the picture by starting from the concept of a three dimensional spherical universe. Let it be expanding and, where concentrations of matter are sufficiently high, let black holes form, which suck away matter and energy.
Therefore we imagine this cosmos as a space-like three-dimensional hyper-surface immersed in a four-dimensional ether. In two dimensions we represent it as a circle.
In this picture, black holes tend to bring matter toward the center. This does not necessarily mean that matter is attracted toward the center, but that it simply tends to bend space-time in one preferred direction, which must be a property of the ether.
As the tips of the black holes come in contact with each other, we imagine that they unite, and that, since there is little matter, the merging region expands, creating a new universe.
The new universe keeps on expanding and, as near the holes the concentration of matter increases, with time it will give rise to stars, galaxies and black holes.
Because of the high energy involved in passing through the holes, the squeezing tends to break the nuclei bonds, and we can imagine that the matter that gets out of the holes be mostly constituted of hydrogen atoms.
So, in this picture we have an undefined number of concentric universes that keep on expanding and pouring matter into younger ones. Every now and then, a new universe is created, and the oldest one vanishes when all its matter is transferred to the one immediately younger. Here is a very rough sketch of how the universes might look like:
Once created, we imagine that the universes tend to expand, but are affected by the holes in a way or another. Black holes tend to oppose expansion, while white holes favor it. So, as more white holes merge with younger universes, their rate of expansion increases.
Since the rate of expansion of the universe we live in keeps on increasing, we argue that it must be rather young.
At this point the following two obvious questions arise: Do white holes that bring particles and energy in our universe exist, and what properties should the particles and radiation that pours out from them have?
Regarding particles, as for me, it is unclear right now. I shall eventually write a post about them later on. What about radiation?
If we consider that radiation is mainly emitted in regions where space-time is strongly bent, and that afterwards it spreads in regions that are almost flat, in passing from a bended to a flat region its frequencies must diminish. This fact is independent of the direction in which space-time is bent. So the exiting radiation must be highly redshifted.
Do in the sky exist very small objects that spew up highly redshifted radiation? Yes. Quasars emit that type of radiation. According to this picture, quasars are not very far objects, as the strong redshift suggests, and the energy they emit is not tremendously high, but more reasonable.
This description provides an explanation of the origin of matter in our universe, and shows that there is no beginning, nor end for the system of universes, but single universes are born and die. The system of universes keeps on rejuvenating itself; it has always existed and will always exist.
The description also shows that there seems to be no means that permit anything with a structure to pass from one universe to another, because the only communications between universes occur through black-white holes, which crush everything to its most elementary constituents.
(If you want to know more on the subject, please contact trevisan.diego@alice.it)
Other posts from Diego Trevisan:
Arguments related to ether and inertia:
— Relativity and the duration of time
— Earth’s velocity with respect to the ether
— The origin of the Minkowski metric
The leading time theory and the Compton effect:
— The leading time and the Compton effect
— Compton effect and uncertainty
— The dual aspect of the elementary particles
Astrophysics:
— The puzzle of the solar corona
Lightnings:
The following post provides a brief description of each argument:
